刺客信条

Philippine official fabricates ‘iron triangle’ narrative over Huangyan Dao; expert rebukes Manila’s smear attempt_我的网站

一 |     

    Drone image shows Philippine public vessels in waters near China's Huangyan Dao on July 23, 2026, for a supply mission for 12 Philippine "octopus boats" in the area. During the cargo transfer operation, a large amount of fuel supplied by the Philippine vessels leaked. Photo: Courtesy of China Coast GuardMarking another attempt to smear China's legitimate actions over Huangyan Dao, a Philippine Coast Guard (PCG) spokesperson claimed that China's possible "militarization" of the island could allow it to dominate much of the South China Sea and threaten freedom of navigation. Chinese experts said the claim deliberately hypes the so-called "China threat" rhetoric and turns the facts on their head, arguing that while Manila itself has been strengthening its military presence and fueling regional tensions, it appears to be demanding unrestricted access for its own vessels to waters around China's Huangyan Dao under the guise of "freedom of navigation."
PCG spokesperson Jay Tarriela claimed on Monday that Huangyan Dao is the last remaining point needed to complete China's "iron triangle" in the disputed waters, according to Manila Bulletin. 
Tarriela claimed during the National Maritime Council's (NMC) first semester press briefing in Manila that if connecting the Xisha Islands with Huangyan Dao, and Huangyan Dao with the Nansha Qundao, "it will allow China to dominate the entire maritime space of the South China Sea." He claimed that such pattern threatens freedom of navigation in a route carrying a large share of global trade.
In a social media post, Tarriela went further, alleging that if China "militarizes it (Huangyan Dao), the triangle closes and the danger stops being a Philippine problem." 
China has never carried out any so-called "militarization" of Huangyan Dao. The latest claim is another victimhood narrative fabricated by certain people in the Philippines to portray the country as being threatened and rally other countries behind its position as freedom of navigation has been a closely watched topic internationally, Chen Xiangmiao, director of the World Navy Research Center at the National Institute for South China Sea Studies, told the Global Times, noting that China's activities around Huangyan Dao mainly involve routine patrols and law enforcement actions by the China Coast Guard to safeguard national sovereignty, security and maritime rights and interests.
China exercises sovereignty and jurisdiction over relevant waters in accordance with law. Even the deployment of law-enforcement forces or necessary defensive capabilities in relevant areas by no means freedom of navigation in the South China Sea would be affected, said Chen.
He argued that the South China Sea remains one of the world's busiest international shipping routes, and normal commercial navigation has never been obstructed by China. What the Philippines calls "freedom of navigation" appears to conflate commercial navigation with its demand that Philippine fishing vessels, coast guard ships, government vessels and even warships be allowed unrestricted access to waters around China's Huangyan Dao.
Last month, the Philippine side organized seven public vessels, three coast guard ships and one fish transport ship, and egged on a large number of fishing boats to illegally assemble in the waters under China's jurisdiction at Huangyan Dao, Jiang Lue, spokesperson for the China Coast Guard (CCG) said.
During this period, three Philippine public vessels - MMOV 3001, MMOV 3005 and MMOV 3017 - ignored repeated dissuasion and warnings from the CCG and obstinately intruded into the territorial waters of China's Huangyan Dao, Jiang added.
The CCG took necessary countermeasures in accordance with the law against the Philippine rights-violation vessels, including verbal warnings, blocking, and shooting water cannons, to resolutely expel them.
The Global Times learned that the Philippines harbored clear provocative intentions in this aggressive intrusion. Its vessel MMOV 3001 repeatedly charged at high speed into the 12-nautical-mile territorial waters surrounding China's Huangyan Dao. On-site footage obtained by the Global Times also shows this Philippine vessel was fitted with anti-collision padding, prepped for anticipated vessel collisions.
Also last month, Chinese foreign ministry firmly rejected and said it will never accept the delimitation of the so-called "baselines of the territorial sea" of China's territory of Huangyan Dao by the Philippines, stressing it is illegal, null and void. 
The statement came after the Philippines claimed it has deposited its official nautical chart of Huangyan Dao and its surrounding maritime zones with the United Nations Secretariat. 
With regard to the Philippines' illegal and false claims, China's Ministry of Foreign Affairs said in the Friday's statement that Huangyan Dao is China's inherent territory. China has indisputable sovereignty over it and its adjacent waters, and has sovereign rights and jurisdiction over the relevant waters. China has continuously, peacefully and effectively exercised sovereignty and jurisdiction over Huangyan Dao. The territory of the Philippines has been defined by a series of international treaties, and Huangyan Dao has never been a part of it. The Philippines' illegal territorial claim over China's Huangyan Dao is completely baseless under international law, according to the ministry.
Chen said that in fact, it is increasingly clear who is fueling militarization in the South China Sea. The Philippines has continued to strengthen their military presence and activities in the region in recent years. Manila's attempt to smear China's legitimate actions around Huangyan Dao as a threat to freedom of navigation is essentially a political narrative rather than a reflection of the actual state of navigation in the South China Sea.
。    在新加坡本科留学赛道上，众多学生及其家长常常向我们提出这样一个问题：究竟什么时间选择前往新加坡留学才是最为恰当的呢？新加坡特殊的教育体制，使得处于高一、高二、高三这三个不同年级阶段的学生，都具备前往新加坡攻读本科的机会。我们认为，决定前往新加坡读本科的理想年龄段，很大程度上取决于个人的学习规划以及学习成绩状况。新加坡本科教育 首先，先科普下新加坡的本科教育。在新加坡，提供本科文凭的院校有新加坡国立大学、南洋理工大学、新加坡管理大学等在内的新加坡本地公立大学，和新加坡PSB学院、Kaplan高等教育学院、詹姆斯库克大学新加坡校区在内的新加坡私立高校。詹姆斯库克大学新加坡校区 新加坡国立大学 同国内的私立院校不一样的是，海外的公立大学和私立高校的主要区别在于资金来源，而不在于学校的好坏。因此，不论是新加坡公立大学还是私立高校的毕业生，回国都享留学生待遇。对于私立高校的本科课程，开学时间分布在全年各个月份，一般在相应学校和专业开学三个月到前半年左右提交申请。公立大学本科课程的开学时间是每年的8月。

二 | 学生可以凭借高考成绩申请，但需要在高三前考出合格语言成绩，高三上学期进行网申。

三 | 初中毕业、高一、高二在读可选择私立高校：新加坡PSB学院、Kaplan高等教育学院高二结业、高三在读、高三结束可选择私立高校：詹姆斯库克大学新加坡校区、科廷大学新加坡校区、新加坡管理学院高考后凭高考成绩申请新加坡公立大学（但需提前提交语言成绩和申请材料）新加坡国立大学、南洋理工大学、新加坡管理大学等什么时候来读本科合适？ 在这里，我们将准备申请本科的高中生分为成绩一般和成绩优异等两个大类型。成绩一般的学生 这类型的学生，常见可以分为以下两种情况：第一种是，在中考阶段就“耗尽”太多力气，或者是通过家长“辅助”等其他渠道进入目标高中。那么在高中阶段，由于前期初中基础知识不够扎实稳固，极有可能出现后续课程学习动力匮乏的状况，最终在高考时很可能呈现出分数线较为一般的结果。第二种是，初中成绩平平，在中考后被分流至普通高中甚至是职业中学。

四 | 在学习氛围相对一般的环境中，孩子难免会受到外界因素的干扰，进而容易形成成绩下滑的趋势。对于这类卷不过，也躺不平的“尴尬”情况，我们通常会建议在初中毕业或者是高一上学期就提交新加坡私立高校的申请。

五 | 因为新加坡私立高校的申请虽然不需要高考成绩，但是需要提交学生的平时成绩。举个例子，如果在高一上学期申请，那么仅需要提交初中平时成绩或者是高一上学期的成绩。反观，如果是在高三再进行申请，那么则需要提交高中整个阶段的平时成绩。如果本身孩子学习动力不足，年级越高，学习越吃力，平时成绩有可能就越低。这样就容易造成“原本能申请的学校，却因为平时成绩过低而无法成功申请”的局面。因此，对于本身资质一般的学生而言，年级越高申请新加坡本科，难度也会越大。

六 | 成绩优异的学生 成绩中等的学生 这类型的学生，若高考成绩非常优异，超过一本线60-100分的学生可以直接选择申请新加坡公立大学，如新加坡国立大学、新加坡南洋理工大学等。但如果想顺利衔接新加坡大学，需要在高二阶段开始准备语言考试并取得合格的成绩，接着在高三上半学期完成网申，待到高考成绩出分后，再补交高考分数。如果在高考后才开始准备申请，会错过当年秋季入学，需推迟一年入学。因此，若需要在高考后选择来新加坡读本科，就需要提前在高二进行规划。这个路径就比较适合以后已经有规划，想要留在新加坡就业或者是打算继续攻读海外硕士的学生选择。毕竟在留坡就业方面，新加坡本地公立大学（NTU/NUS/SMU）的毕业生在申请EP时会有20分的加分。不仅如此，新加坡国立大学和南洋理工大学的世界排名高，若后续申请海外硕士时，本科背景是个加分项。成绩优异的学生也能凭借新加坡公立大学的优秀背景而锦上添花。总的而言，如果想送孩子本科来新加坡留学，高一高二阶段对成绩一般的孩子申请更加友好，也能使他们能更早地适应新加坡的海外教育体系；高三毕业后可以凭借高考成绩申请本地公立大学，适合成绩非常出众的孩子。

七 | 建议各位家长根据孩子的学习成绩、个人情况和未来发展规划综合考虑后做出选择。

Current article:http://yzi.lindunfokangliucishirun.shop/uocb/20260826/4156.html

Published on:18:51:45